Reduced failure rate from 20% to 0.4%

On a complex automated proteomics × NGS library prep platform.

Impact
  • Failure rate reduced from 20% to 0.4%
  • Reduced consumables by 40%
  • Reduced manual pipetting by 64%
  • Improved robustness, usability, and cost efficiency for scaled deployment

The Problem

A high-throughput automated NGS library prep workflow for proteomics was experiencing high failure rates and operational complexity in customer labs.

Key Issues:

  • High consumable cost and plastic waste
  • Frequent user interruptions and manual pipetting
  • Automation crashes driven by lid handling failures
  • Contamination risk during sample handling
  • Limited on-instrument guidance and high training burden

What Was Breaking

The system was not failing in one place. It was failing across the workflow.

  • Too many manual touchpoints in an automated process
  • Deck layout that increased movement, flyover, and contamination risk
  • Consumable complexity that added cost and operational burden
  • Lid handling steps that created repeat automation failures
  • Limited user guidance, increasing training burden and error risk

System-Level Approach

Led end-to-end workflow and consumables optimization across teams (assay, automation, software, and field) to improve cost, robustness, and usability.

  • Redesigned the end-to-end workflow across automation, consumables, and user interaction
  • Optimized deck layout to reduce movement, flyover, and contamination risk
  • Validated consumable reuse and consolidated redundant components
  • Eliminated lid handling steps driving automation failures
  • Implemented guided UI prompts to reduce training burden and user error

Outcomes

  • Improved workflow robustness and reliability in customer labs
  • Reduced training burden and user error
  • Failure rate reduced from 20% to 0.4%
  • Consumables reduced by 40%
  • Manual pipetting reduced by 64%

Why This Worked

The improvements did not come from optimizing a single step. They came from redesigning the workflow as a system across automation, consumables, and user interaction.

By reducing manual interventions, simplifying deck design, and removing failure-prone handling steps, the workflow became more robust in real lab environments while also reducing cost and support burden.

Before / After

Workflow by the numbers.

MetricBeforeAfterImpact
Total items loaded to liquid handler573735% ↓
Unique consumable part numbers141214% ↓
Total consumable items633840% ↓
User interactions403415% ↓
Manual pipetting steps25964% ↓
Workflow failure rate20%0.4%98% ↓
Working on something similar?

Start a conversation.